A note from the editor:
A
couple of weeks ago I read a play called The
Christians by Lucas Hnath. It’s about a pastor who, in accordance with his
own changing beliefs, one day preaches to his congregation that there is no Hell,
which ends up causing a big schism in his congregation as people try to grapple
with what the universe would look like without the idea of Hell. He begins this
initial sermon with his desire to talk with God, “I have a powerful urge to communicate with you, but I find the
distance between us insurmountable.” He then later remarks, “We put the distance there. When we shun
our neighbors, when we judge our friends, when we look down at people from
other places and other religions, we create an insurmountable distance where
there is no distance at all.”
I liked
this play for many reasons. It felt complicated and sticky, not unlike my own
self, and there was no clear resolution in the end. There was only distance.
Distance that could continue to grow. Or stop. Or disappear.
I have
a powerful urge to communicate with my Heavenly Parents, but sometimes I feel
an insurmountable distance. I am sure that this distance is woman and man-made.
Intentionally or not, we create distance between ourselves and strangers,
ourselves and people we love, ourselves and God. Fortunately, we can close this
distance through Christ, no matter how insurmountable or incomprehensive the
distance may seem.
May we close the distance between God and
ourselves. May we find healing from
pain, from injury, from unfairness, from loneliness, from distance through both
the suffering and grace of Christ.
Shorten
the distance and between you and this individual and take a read.
story 13 of many.
Healing the Wounds of My Cross
The New
Testament tells us repeatedly to take up
our cross to follow Christ. The one time this is literally portrayed, on
the Savior’s march to Calvary, it is a brutally
painful experience; the Creator stumbled and fell three times. The cross is
undoubtedly a symbol of suffering yet (while our church doesn’t embrace this aspect)
also the symbol of Christianity. Indeed, carrying one’s cross is a scriptural
metaphor for living the gospel—even when it’s hard.
Unfortunately,
for some—probably for many—the paradox
of the cross representing both Christ’s church and suffering is reality. I
was recently reflecting on the process of healing I’ve gone through since
talking to my bishop a year ago about some of the painful complexities of my
life. I don’t mean healing in the context of repentance; I mean healing in the
context of being made whole, of
undoing damage that has been inflicted. I’ve recognized this healing for some
time now, but I only recently asked myself what it was that I was healing from.
In doing so, I came to the (perhaps unsettling to some) conclusion that I was healing
in large part from wounds inflicted on me both directly and indirectly by the
church.
However,
by continuing on the path of healing, I came to another realization: accepting this unfortunate fact is not only
okay; for me, it’s necessary.
I can see
church-driven damage from early in my life. It was clear to me as a child that
my mother placed a higher priority on fulfilling her church callings than
caring for her children, whose needs frequently went unattended. She spent
countless hours serving the Relief Society in various ways, and in doing so,
she turned a blind eye to many of her maternal responsibilities. I’m sure she
was doing good things, but she ultimately wasn’t doing the best, most important
things. I still feel the repercussions of her and my equally emotionally absent
father being unconcerned for me during my childhood.
Had a
priesthood leader seen the toll my mother’s many years of service in her
demanding callings were having on her children, I imagine he would have
intervened and counseled her, “Sister, how are things at home? How are your
children faring? Do you spend quality time with each of them?” but if any such
dialogue took place, it didn’t lead to any increase in attention to her
domestic responsibilities. This left me feeling unimportant to the person whose
love I should have felt the most abundantly and had psychological consequences
that last to this day. The rhetoric that the gospel should be the most
important thing in our lives, that we should be completely devoted to it,
failed to bring the Savior’s love into my childhood home. I’m sure that not a
single church leader meant any harm by asking my mother to serve in the
capacities she did for such a long time. Still, that doesn’t diminish the fact
that church structures and rhetoric resulted in my personal pain.
The
pain and damage I’ve felt in my adult years as a result of the church have at
times felt much more intentional, especially as a gay member. I’ve heard so
many members, young and old, talk about how gays are inherently sinful and will
all be destroyed by God. Apostles are called of God, but that doesn’t mean they
are perfect—and just as we’ve had racist apostles in the past, it doesn’t mean
that some of them aren’t homophobic. Intentionally or not, they repeatedly say
things that inflict harm on gay members and encourage straight members to do
the same. The church’s days of condoning physically assaulting gay members
during general conference have thankfully passed, but many of the church’s
current “encouraged practices” do much more harm than good while inflicting gay
members, even temple-worthy ones, with self-loathing and deep shame.
What’s
been even more damaging for me than the church’s overt statements against gays
is the way that the church presents the doctrine of salvation. Exaltation
requires you to make sacred covenants officiated by priesthood authority,
including the sealing ordinance, which requires you to covenant not only with
Heavenly Father but with a member of the opposite sex, and the church says that
it is inappropriate for gay members to make that sacred covenant. The church’s
current policies and teachings hold that you can’t receive all the saving
ordinances if you’re homosexual: despite rhetoric to the contrary, the church
teaches that gays can’t be exalted unless they somehow become straight while
simultaneously acknowledging that this isn’t a choice they can actually make. Imagine the damage that does.
Unpleasant
though it may be, some of my deepest wounds have been caused by the church—yet
with my bishop’s help, I’ve started to
truly heal. He told me that being gay didn’t mean I was broken. It didn’t
mean I was less. It didn’t mean that I needed fixing, that God wouldn’t accept
me unless I were something I wasn’t. He spent time listening to what I was
feeling. He expressed his encouragement, support, and sympathy. He showed love for me. He was there for
me in ways neither of my parents ever was. Most importantly, my bishop has
empowered me in ways that enabled me to feel my Heavenly Father’s love for me
in ways I had been blocked from feeling it before. He has assisted me in transforming Christ’s love from an abstract ideal
to a real thing I feel in my life. He wasn’t the only one who helped me
with this, but he played a major role in helping me initiate my healing
process.
I
consider myself lucky—and blessed—to have had a bishop who helped the church be
more of a positive influence in my life. My bishop could have said so many
things that would have caused further damage or pain. He could have said that
recognizing the ways that the church has negatively impacted me is a fault, an
indication that my testimony isn’t sufficiently strong. He could have dismissed
the pain I’ve felt as trivial or exaggerated. He could have told me that my
homosexuality is a problem that needs fixing or the consequence of my own sins.
Thankfully, he didn’t say any of these things. His only interest was in helping me forward, in helping me to heal, in
bringing the Savior more into my life. And the Savior, He is the ultimate
source of healing. Christ is intimately familiar with the cross I carry: He has
carried it, too. I was recently discussing with a friend the struggle I face
trying to reconcile the church with my sexuality, and she bore a beautiful
testimony—despite her lack of understanding how homosexuality works within the
Plan of Salvation—of how the Savior understands how I feel, how He knows all my
struggles and fears and pains. He walks with me as I chart this difficult path,
and I know that so long as I remain close to Him, I will not wander astray,
whatever path I take.
Carrying
my own cross has caused immense suffering in my life, and a good deal of it has
been caused by the church. None of that should have happened. But dealing with
things that shouldn’t have happened is part of life; it’s part of the adversity
we came here to face. And accepting that the church is responsible for some of
the pain I’ve been caused allows me to let go, to move on, and to heal. I
wouldn’t be who I am today without the church in some wonderful ways. I love
the church for that. So while my cross
makes living the Gospel harder, it also reminds me why it’s worth it: it brings
me closer to Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, the Redeemer of all mankind. It
helps me to be more like Him, and that is who I want to be. It transforms the
broken into the whole.
Comments
Post a Comment